Thursday, Sep 24, 2020 | Last Update : 03:01 PM IST

184th Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra122438091634833015 Andhra Pradesh6317495518215410 Tamil Nadu5473374919718871 Karnataka5268764233778145 Uttar Pradesh3588932895945135 Delhi2492592133045014 West Bengal2283021989834421 Odisha184122149379763 Telangana1726081419301042 Bihar169856155824870 Assam159320129130578 Kerala13863398720554 Gujarat1247671051913337 Rajasthan116881972841352 Haryana113075908841177 Madhya Pradesh108167836182007 Punjab99930754092860 Chhatisgarh8618347653680 Jharkhand7267358543626 Jammu and Kashmir65026421151024 Uttarakhand4177729000501 Goa2875322726360 Puducherry2319118065467 Tripura2227215441245 Himachal Pradesh124387836125 Chandigarh102987411123 Manipur9010683859 Arunachal Pradesh7385540813 Nagaland5544445110 Meghalaya4733252838 Sikkim2447190529 Mizoram158510120
  Metros   Mumbai  10 Feb 2018  Pravin Togadia wants law for Ram Mandir

Pravin Togadia wants law for Ram Mandir

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Feb 10, 2018, 4:26 am IST
Updated : Feb 10, 2018, 4:26 am IST

The Ayodhya land dispute case is one of the oldest cases of the country.

Pravin Togadia
 Pravin Togadia

Mumbai: VHP leader Pravin Togadia has demanded to make the law in parliament for Ram Mandir. Mr Togadia was in Aurangabad, Maharas-htra when he made this demand. He also said that it is the government’s prerogative about what it wants to do with the triple talaq and he has nothing to do with that. The hearing of Ram Mandir has started in the Supreme Court and the next date for the hearing will be March 14.

“Ram is in Vanvas and we are in home. The government should make a law in the parliament to build the Ram temple. The government should understand that people have voted for Ram temple and not for triple talaq,” said Mr Togadia. He also said that he respects the Supreme Court  but the decision is getting delayed.

 

Mr Togadia gave this statement in the hearing of the Ayodhya land dispute case. The bench headed by Chief Justice of India, Deepak Mishra has made remarks on Thursday that the court will hear the case as any other land dispute. “Whatever be the case, it is after all a land dispute. There are appeals and cross-appeals (against the Allahabad HC judgment on title suits) from both sides. We will decide about the land dispute after taking into account the evidence on record and after hearing both the sides,” bench said.

The Ayodhya land dispute case is one of the oldest cases of the country. In the last hearing on December 5, 2017 senior lawyer Kapil Signal had requested the court to postpone it and keep it after 2019 general elections.

 

The Allahabad bench had suggested that the disputed land should be divided in three parts and be given to Ram Lalla deity, Sunni Waqf Board and Nirmohi Akhara. But this decision was challenged and now the case is in the apex court.

Tags: ram mandir issue, chief justice of india, ayodhya, deepak mishra