Friday, Apr 19, 2024 | Last Update : 07:27 AM IST

  Life   Health  31 Jan 2017  Human footprint is severely damaging natural heritage sites

Human footprint is severely damaging natural heritage sites

AP
Published : Jan 31, 2017, 7:21 pm IST
Updated : Jan 31, 2017, 7:27 pm IST

Keoladeo National Park in Rajasthan was subject to the highest levels of human pressure of any NWHS

The most impacted NWHS were found in Asia, including Manas Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam, Chitwan National Park in Nepal, and Simien National Park in Ethiopia.
 The most impacted NWHS were found in Asia, including Manas Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam, Chitwan National Park in Nepal, and Simien National Park in Ethiopia.

More than 100 natural World Heritage sites are being severely damaged by encroaching human activities, with the India's Keoladeo National Park and Manas Wildlife Sanctuary among those facing the highest level of human footprints, a new study has warned.

Natural World Heritage Sites (NWHS), via the formal process run by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation), are globally recognised as containing some of the Earth's most valuable natural assets. Researchers, including those from the University of Queensland in Australia and Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) in the US, looked at human pressure over time using the global Human Footprint criteria, which includes roads, agriculture, urbanisation and industrial infrastructure, along with forest loss.

They found that the Human Footprint has increased in 63 per cent of NWHS across all continents except Europe over the past two decades. The most impacted NWHS were found in Asia, including Manas Wildlife Sanctuary in Assam, Chitwan National Park in Nepal, and Simien National Park in Ethiopia. Keoladeo National Park in Rajasthan was subject to the highest levels of human pressure of any NWHS.

In terms of forest loss, highly imp acted parks included the Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve in Honduras, which lost 365 square kilometres (8.5 per cent) of their forest respectively, since 2000. Even celebrated places like Yellowstone National Park in the US were impacted, losing some six per cent of its forests.

Meanwhile, Waterton Glacier International Peace Park that crosses the Canadian and US border lost almost one quarter of its forested area (23 per cent or 540 square kilometres). "World Heritage natural sites should be maintained and protected fully. For a site to lose ten or twenty per cent of its forested area in two decades is alarming and must be addressed," said James Allan, from University of Queensland.

"Any place that is listed as a World Heritage site is a globally important asset to all of humanity," said James Watson of the University of Queensland. "The world would never accept the Acropolis being knocked down, or a couple of pyramids being flattened for housing estates or roads, yet right now, across our planet, we are simply letting many of our natural World Heritage sites be severely altered," Watson said.

"It is time for the global community to stand up and hold governments to account so that they take the conservation of natural World Heritage sites seriously," said Allan. "Urgent intervention is clearly needed to save these places and their outstanding natural universal values," he said.

Some NWHS such as the Sinharaja Forest Reserve and Mana Pools National Park showed minimal change in forest loss or human pressure, but the authors say they are in the minority. The research appears in the journal Biological Conservation.

Tags: world heritage sites, damaged world heritage sites, heritage sites