Use of peacock feather may soon face a ban

TAB1.jpg

The peacock feather is making the fur fly. The proposed ban on the use of the peacock feather (even those naturally shed) has triggered surprise and dismay among young product designers, who consider the beautiful bird their muse. They use the gorgeous blue-green feathers to make home decor items, pens, earrings, etc and find nothing amiss in creatively using the shed feathers for artistic utility.
If recent reports are to be believed, the Ministry of Environment and Forest after finding many peacocks dead in the area surrounding Agra and other places in the country, and is thinking about banning the domestic use of the peacock feather.
The officials from the ministry say that the national bird is being poached for feathers and once the tip of the feather is cut, even forensic reports can’t find out if the feather was naturally shed or forcibly pulled out. And to protect the national bird, which is gradually becoming a prey of the growing business, the ministry thinks nothing could be better than banning its trade.
But the move doesn’t seem so easy. Keeping in mind, the sentiments of people — as many believe that a peacock’s tail feather is lucky or auspicious to keep at home, students keep it in the notebooks considering it a symbol of wisdom and artist swear it as one of the most beautiful things given by nature — before taking a final decision, the government has asked for a public opinion on the issue.
Designer duo Rahul & Gunjan have decorated their designer rickshaw (to be displayed during the Commonwealth Games) with peacock feathers. Rahul says, “Some feathers that I have used to decorate my rickshaw are from my childhood collection,” says Rahul, who thinks that the government should think of a better way to stop peacock poaching.
He even says that most artists understand that saving the national bird is more important than anything else. “I don’t think any sensible person would kill the bird for monetary interest. If the government is taking the issue seriously, instead of a ban, they should take a step towards protecting them.”
Agrees wedding planner Sumathy Bachchan, “It is good that the Forest Ministry is thinking about the national bird. Banning the use would not help. They should have a better patrolling system in areas where the bird is found,” she says.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Life and Style

“It went too soon, too soon That age when cats fiddled And cows jumped over the moon...” From Tension Nahin Leneka by Bachchoo On the strength of a few series of situation comedy for TV and the fact that I have written material for stand-up comics and parodists, I am invited to participate in a seminar on comedy at a German university. The particular department of the university has post-graduate students who learn through the medium of English and in the case of this seminar have chosen the option of what universities call “post-colonial” studies.

The year is still new, and we are full of good intentions. This week we learnt that the government’s sporadic efforts — mostly weak and often mindless — to change anti-dowry laws for better implementation may include laying down rules on how much you can spend on weddings. The Planning Commission’s Working Group on Women’s Agency and Empowerment has recommended an income-linked ceiling on marriage expenditure, which would include gifts as well as celebratory feasts. In short, if you try to spend beyond your means on your daughter or son’s wedding, you’d better be ready for the dowry inspector.