Thursday, Apr 25, 2024 | Last Update : 05:32 PM IST

  India   SC quashes acquisition of land for Tata Nano factory in West Bengal’s Singur

SC quashes acquisition of land for Tata Nano factory in West Bengal’s Singur

AGE CORRESPONDENT WITH AGENCY INPUTS
Published : Aug 31, 2016, 3:21 pm IST
Updated : Aug 31, 2016, 3:21 pm IST

The apex court directed the West Bengal government to distribute the land to owners within 12 weeks.

Nano car shells at the abandoned Tata Motors' factory at Singur in Hooghly district. (Photo: PTI/File)
 Nano car shells at the abandoned Tata Motors' factory at Singur in Hooghly district. (Photo: PTI/File)

The apex court directed the West Bengal government to distribute the land to owners within 12 weeks.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday set aside Calcutta High Court order upholding the 2006 land acquisition for Tata's Nano plant at Singur in West Bengal.

Finding fault with the land acquisition process, the apex court said that the acquired land be returned to the cultivators within 12 weeks from today.

“Land acquisition collector has not properly conducted the inquiry into the complaints of cultivators with regard to acquisition of plots. The acquisition of land by the State for a company does not fall under the purview of public purpose, said the Supreme Court.

Tata Motors, which was allotted land for its proposed Nano car plant in Singur in West Bengal, which eventually was shifted to Gujarat, had a tough time in the Supreme Court this May, justifying its claim for retaining it.

Hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the quashing of Singur Land Acquisition Act by the Calcutta High Court, a bench comprising justices V Gopala Gowda and Arun Mishra had questioned the manner in which over 400 acres of land was allotted to Tata Motors without adhering to the section 4 and 5 of the Land Acquisition Act, which mandates public notice for receiving objections.

The bench had noted that the entire exercise was done by "bulldozing the law" as the then Cabinet suo motu cleared the allocation of the land identified by the automobile major which was the task of the government of the day.

The bench said it was a farcical exercise through which the land was allocated and it was a "legal mala fide".

It had said there were several grey areas which needed to be answered and the company has to first address those questions.

The court said, "You cannot argue that they (farmers) have accepted the award so they cannot challenge the acquisition. This case is under different footing and there are several issues which needs to be answered."

Senior advocates appearing for the company had submitted that the matter should be referred to the constitution bench which was not accepted by the bench which continued with the hearing.

The state government had moved the apex court against the High Court order which had struck down the Singur Land Rehabilitation and Development Act 2011 that allowed it to reclaim the 400 acres of land given to Tata Motors.

(This article first appeared in Deccan Chronicle)