Monday, Aug 21, 2017 | Last Update : 09:15 PM IST

India’s nuclear regulatory law worries GE

THE ASIAN AGE.
Published : Dec 26, 2016, 3:21 am IST
Updated : Dec 26, 2016, 3:59 am IST

Foreign suppliers have raised concerns about the Right to Recourse under the Act, which they feel is “ambiguous”.

The Civil Liability Nuclear Damage Act , 2010, was passed by Parliament two years after the historic Civil Nuclear Cooperation agreement between the US and India.
 The Civil Liability Nuclear Damage Act , 2010, was passed by Parliament two years after the historic Civil Nuclear Cooperation agreement between the US and India.

New Delhi: India’s Civil Nuclear Liability law still seems to be haunting its atomic sector, with US major GE reportedly expressing concern over the absence of a “sustainable regulatory environment” and seeking more “clarity” before entering into a partnership with the Indian side.

According to news agency reports, while Indian officials do admit that there has been a “lukewarm” response by GE, they played it down saying the company does not have a reference plant, a pre-requisite to go ahead with the project. GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, one of the two US companies, is supposed to build six reactors in India.

Banmali Agrawala, president and CEO for GE South Asia, was quoted by news agency PTI as saying “GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy believes the path forward requires a sustainable regulatory environment, which would include a nuclear liability law that channels liability to plant operators consistent with global practices. We continue to have a strong interest in providing our technology to India for the eventual construction of multiple ESBWRs (economic simplified boiling water reactor).” Mr Agrawala asserted that though the Indian government has taken several steps, including establishing a Nuclear Insurance Pool, to address the concerns of the foreign collaborators, the law required more “clarity”. “After all, it is the law that prevails and not the clarification (referring to the FAQs),” he said.

The Civil Liability Nuclear Damage Act , 2010, was passed by Parliament two years after the historic Civil Nuclear Cooperation agreement between the US and India. Foreign suppliers have raised concerns about the Right to Recourse under the Act, which they feel is “ambiguous”.

However, Indian officials said the GE was raising the concern, as it does not have a reference plant, without which it can’t go ahead with the setting up reactors in the country.

“They (GE) should furnish a reference plant by the time negotiations are sealed,” a senior government official was quoted as saying.

The department of atomic energy has also asked other foreign collaborators like the French company, EDF, and US’ WestingHouse to provide them with information on their reference plant, he said.

Following the concerns raised by foreign suppliers, India also ratified the Convention of Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage, marking an important step in addressing matters related to civil nuclear liabilities earlier this year.

India has been, to a large extent, able to address the concerns of the French and the Russian companies but some others like GE still insist that a strong and sustainable regulatory mechanism was required to move forward.

As per the information on GE-Hitachi’s website, in 2015, DTE Energy received the first-ever ESBWR-based combined construction and operating license from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). “Dominion Virginia Power has also selected the ESBWR as its technology of choice for a potential third reactor at the North Anna site,” the website states. However, there is no operational reference plant.

Tags: environment, atomic sector, civil nuclear liability law
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi