Saturday, Jul 04, 2020 | Last Update : 05:39 PM IST

102nd Day Of Lockdown

Maharashtra1929901046878376 Tamil Nadu102721583781385 Delhi92175630072864 Gujarat34686249411905 Uttar Pradesh2579717597749 West Bengal2048813571717 Telangana2046210195283 Karnataka197108807293 Rajasthan1925615352443 Andhra Pradesh176998008218 Haryana1550911019251 Madhya Pradesh1410610815589 Bihar10911821184 Assam8956583212 Jammu and Kashmir76954856105 Odisha7316535333 Punjab56683989149 Kerala4594243626 Uttarakhand2791190937 Chhatisgarh2339193713 Jharkhand2339160512 Tripura140110931 Manipur13166390 Goa11984783 Himachal Pradesh9796179 Puducherry73930112 Nagaland5351820 Chandigarh4463676 Arunachal Pradesh182601 Mizoram1601230 Sikkim101520 Meghalaya50421
  India   All India  07 Dec 2018  Supreme Court questions overnight action against CBI chief

Supreme Court questions overnight action against CBI chief

AGE CORRESPONDENT WITH AGENCY INPUTS
Published : Dec 7, 2018, 2:32 am IST
Updated : Dec 7, 2018, 4:10 am IST

A bench headed, by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, inquired about the reasons behind the sudden decision by the Centre and the CVC to act against Verma.

CBI director Alok Verma (Photo: PTI)
 CBI director Alok Verma (Photo: PTI)

New Delhi: The “essence” of every government action must be in the interest of the institution, the Supreme Court observed on Thursday while questioning the government and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) about the “grave exigency” that prompted the “overn-ight” decision to divest CBI director Alok Verma of his powers over his bitter feud with special director Rakesh Asthana. The court reserved its verdict on the petition filed by Mr Verma challenging the Centre’s October 23 decision to divest him of all powers and sending him on leave.

A bench headed, by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, inquired about the reasons behind the sudden decision by the Centre and the CVC to act against Mr Verma.

 

“It was not that the fight between Mr Verma and Mr Asthana emerged overnight, forcing the government to divest the director of powers without consulting the selection committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice,” the court said.

The bench, also comprising Justice S.K. Kaul and K.M. Joseph, posed searching questions to the CVC for waiting for more than three months to intervene in the feud between Mr Verma and Mr Asthana over corruption allegations levelled against each other.

“Institutions cannot be allowed to crumble… The essence of every government action must be in the interest of the institution and to adopt the best course,” said the bench.

At one stage, the court asked, “Can there be an acting director?” Mr Verma’s counsel and senior advocate F.S. Nariman replied in the affirmative.

The bench also asked if the apex court can appoint anyone to head the CBI. Mr Nariman responded that the top court can do so as it has the powers under the Constitution.

The Supreme Court noted that attorney-general K.K. Venugopal had submitted that the circumstances culminating in the situation in the probe agency had started in July but the government action came in October.

“Can you see the situation which prompted CVC to take action. It was not overnight. It was happening since July as the attorney-general said,” the bench said.

The bench said that the government has to be ”fair” and asked what was the difficulty in consulting the selection committee before divesting the CBI director of his powers.

“Mr Nariman’s submission is also what is the difficulty in consulting the selection panel. It is better to consult the selection panel. What is the best in the interest of the administration of the institution,” the bench said, adding “at the earliest, go to the panel or committee when there is a grave exigency”.

Tags: supreme court, central vigilance commission, alok verma
Location: India, Delhi, New Delhi