Tuesday, Apr 23, 2024 | Last Update : 11:25 PM IST

   India-Eng Rajkot Test will be cancelled if funds are not released: BCCI to SC

India-Eng Rajkot Test will be cancelled if funds are not released: BCCI to SC

: AGE CORRESPONDENT WITH AGENCY INPUTS
Published : Nov 8, 2016, 1:26 pm IST
Updated : Nov 8, 2016, 1:26 pm IST

The SC had ordered BCCI to stop disbursing funds to state units till they abide by Lodha Panel recommendations.

 The apex court is likely to hear the matter today (Tuesday). (Photo: PTI)
  The apex court is likely to hear the matter today (Tuesday). (Photo: PTI)

The SC had ordered BCCI to stop disbursing funds to state units till they abide by Lodha Panel recommendations.

Mumbai

: The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has moved to the Supreme Court seeking permission for release of funds for the first Test between India and England in Rajkot.

BCCI has been asked to not release funds to state associations without prior approval from the Lodha panel.

The Indian cricket board also told SC that they would have to cancel the first Test if the funds are not released.

The apex court is likely to hear the matter on Tuesday itself.

On the other hand, Lodha Panel has opposed BCCI's submission. The Panel says the cricket body is in contempt by not obeying the apex court's directions.

SC bench has informed BCCI that it will consult the Chief Justice of India (CJI) on the matter.

Last month, the Supreme Court cracked its whip against a "defiant and obstructionist" BCCI, its president Anurag Thakur and GM (cricket operation) Ratnakar Shetty for "undermining" the Justice R M Lodha committee's directions and ordered the cash-rich body to stop disbursing funds to state units till they abided by its recommendations on reforms in "letter and spirit".

The apex court, which warned the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) against "precipitating" the issue, had also directed Thakur to explain by filing "personal affidavit", the allegation "whether he had asked the CEO of the ICC to state that the appointment of Justice Lodha Committee was tantamount to government interference in the working of the BCCI".

Shetty, a long-standing cricket administrator and General Manager (Admin and Game development) at BCCI, was also directed by the top court to come clean by placing on record a copy of the authorisation/resolution passed by the BCCI on the basis of which he has filed the affidavit supporting the response of the BCCI to the status report.

Both Thakur and Shetty were directed by the apex court to file separate affidavits within 10 days before the matter is taken up for further hearing on October 17.

A bench headed by Chief Justice T S Thakur noted the submission of BCCI that the cricket body has received Rs 2500 crore towards compensation on account of termination of Champion League T-20 tournament, out of which Rs 16.73 crore each remained to be given to state bodies after disbursal of amounts towards taxes and other liabilities

It also took into account the submission of BCCI that out of the 25 associations, only 13 of them have so far received the balance amount of Rs 16.73 crore each and 12 have not received the amount.

The bench had said the sequence of events after July 18, which are referred to in the status report, "prima facie give an impression that BCCI has far from lending its fullest cooperation to the Committee, adopted an obstructionist and at times a defiant attitude which the Committee has taken note of and described as an impediment, undermining not only the Committee but even the dignity of this Court, with several statements and actions which according to the Committee are grossly out of order and may even constitute contempt".

It directed that "no further amount in terms of the Resolution passed in AGM on November 9, 2015, or any subsequent resolution by the BCCI or its Working Committee shall be disbursed to any State Association except where the State Association concerned passes a proper resolution to the effect that it is agreeable to undertake and to support the reforms as proposed and accepted by this Court in letter and spirit".